Evaluating the alternatives
The study team has identified several interchange alternatives, including a “no build” option. The team developed the following two-step evaluation process to help choose the alternative that best meets the project’s purpose and need.
Step 1 - Fatal flaw screening
We analyzed the alternatives for the following:
- Compatibility with Bellevue’s plans and policies
- Compliance with federal and state policies
- Feasibility of construction
Using this process, we eliminated several alternatives.
Step 2 - Alternatives evaluation
We are evaluating the alternatives that passed the fatal flaw screening based on the following criteria:
- Travel time
- Missing links, barriers or conflict points
- Impact on property development
- Alignment with adopted plans
- Costs
- Stakeholder support
- Community input
Learn more about the preliminary alternatives and take our survey on the next tab.
Share Evaluating the alternatives on Facebook
Share Evaluating the alternatives on Twitter
Share Evaluating the alternatives on Linkedin
Email Evaluating the alternatives link
Consultation has concluded